Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 36.2 | 27.1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
