18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R19	R13 - R23	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

Number of tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet braking

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 66%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 64%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 74%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 68%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 68%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

88%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 83%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 73%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 91%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 83%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 85%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 85%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

65%

Dry braking

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 71%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Dry handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 65%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 75%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Comfort

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 74%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

70%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 65%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 66%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Price/value

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 75%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 70%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

77.7%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 15 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1–	1
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 Rating: Good	3	2–	1	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Kleber Krisalp HP3	36.2	27.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	36.0	27.3
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Kleber Krisalp HP3	37.8	29.3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Kleber Krisalp HP3	35,1	29,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Kleber KRISALP HP3	37,3	25,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2-	2-	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	3+	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2-	2	2+	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	3+	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,7	26,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Show test details

Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands