18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R13 - R19	R15 - R19	R14 - R19	R13 - R23	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

5. Barum Polaris 5 76

6. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

Number of tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

5. Barum Polaris 5 13x

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

5. Barum Polaris 5 9.

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

5. Barum Polaris 5 26.

6. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

5. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

4. Barum Polaris 5 2023

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Barum Polaris 5 Good

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

6. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

6. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

73%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

73%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

62%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 76%

5. Barum Polaris 5 65%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 64%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

3. Barum Polaris 5 58%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 55%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 46%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 73%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 71%

5. Barum Polaris 5 62%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet handling

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 63%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

4. Barum Polaris 5 69%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 52%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

4. Barum Polaris 5 C

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

6. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

81%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Barum
Polaris 5

74%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

52%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 77%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 75%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 46%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 83%

4. Barum Polaris 5 74%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 71%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 78%

3. Barum Polaris 5 78%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 71%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 50%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 82%

3. Barum Polaris 5 72%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 42%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

71%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

69%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

66%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

60%

Dry braking

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Barum Polaris 5 63%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 57%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Dry handling

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. Barum Polaris 5 78%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 62%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

67%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

3. Barum Polaris 5 72%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 69%

5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 62%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Comfort

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 69%

4. Barum Polaris 5 69%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 0%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

5. Barum Polaris 5 ?

6. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

79%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

78%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

69%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

67%

Mileage

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 71%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

5. Barum Polaris 5 70%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 80%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 74%

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 82%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 63%

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 56%

6. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

4. Barum Polaris 5 E

5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

6. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

77.7%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.8%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 11 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3	3+	3	2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	3	3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Kleber Krisalp HP3	37.8	29.3
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	38.6	29.6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	3
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2.3	3.4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2.9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-	2-
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2+	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Kleber Krisalp HP3	35,1	29,3
Barum Polaris 5	35,6	31,0
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	37,4	30,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Kleber KRISALP HP3	37,3	25,5
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	26,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	3+	2
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2-	2	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+	3+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	29,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	2-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	34,4	24,6
Barum Polaris 5	35,2	24,9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,3	24,5
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905	35,4	26,1
Falken EuroWinter HS01	37	27
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Kleber KRISALP HP3	32,2	24
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	33,5	24,3
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905	32,5	26
Falken EuroWinter HS01	33,9	26,1
Show test details

Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands