Segment
1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium4. Kleber Krisalp HP2 Upper-middle5. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Krisalp HP2 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Barum Polaris 3 10.64. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 | 36,1 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 38,9 | 27,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 4,6 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 4,4 | 1,5 | 2,0 |
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 2,2 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | 3,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 2,0 |
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: - | 2,7 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,6 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 | 42,9 | 28,7 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 | 36,9 | 28,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Snowtrac 5 | 44,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: - | 1 | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
