Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Kleber Krisalp HP2 Upper-middle3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle4. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Krisalp HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Nokian WR D4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR D4 6.043. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | 2- | 3 | 1- | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 39,1 | 25,7 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 4,6 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 4,4 | 1,5 | 2,0 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | 2,7 | 3,3 | 1,7 | 2,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 | 42,9 | 28,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 41,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | 2- | 3+ | 1- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
