Segment
1. Kleber Krisalp HP2 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Krisalp HP2 vs. Barum Polaris 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Barum (63%). But when it comes to comparing Kleber Krisalp HP2 and Barum Polaris 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Krisalp HP2 and the Polaris 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kleber Krisalp HP2
| Barum Polaris 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 4,6 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 4,4 | 1,5 | 2,0 |
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | 3,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 | 42,9 | 28,7 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
