• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (3)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2023 225/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2020 245/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2019 225/45 R17 View

When comparing the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Kumho Ecsta PS71, it is clear that each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Both models are designed for summer driving, which means they perform optimally in warm, dry conditions.


The Kleber Dynaxer UHP stands out for its quiet exterior noise, a feature that makes driving more comfortable and enjoyable. However, Autobild tests have revealed some potential issues. The tyre ranks 15 out of 53, with criticisms aimed at its moderate grip and limited aquaplaning reserves when driving in the wet. Despite this, it does offer good mileage and low rolling resistance, making it a cost-effective choice for long-term driving. In terms of our general rating, this model scores a 68%.


Kumho's Ecsta PS71, on the other hand, scored slightly better with a rating of 72%. In testing, this tyre demonstrated a balanced high performance potential with good handling characteristics, which contributed to its 18th place ranking out of 53. It also boasts short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces and offers a fair price. However, this model does have a slightly higher exterior noise level.


In the Autobild 2023 trial, additional qualitative insights were shared. For Kleber Dynaxer UHP, its good mileage and quiet rolling noise were once again mentioned as key strengths. However, some drawbacks like mediocre grip and poor lateral control in wet conditions were reported. As for the Kumho Ecsta PS71, its fair price and high performance balanced with good handling qualities were accentuated, but it was also pointed out that it creates more driving noise.


Ultimately, the choice between the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 depends upon personal driving preferences and conditions. If peace and quiet are paramount and you mostly travel on dry roads, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP would be a solid choice. Otherwise, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 offers better overall performance, especially in wet conditions. Both the Kleber and the Kumho are quality tyre manufacturers with solid reputations, offering reliable and efficient products for all drivers..

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
63%
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Kumho Ecsta PS71
78%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Wet Braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Wet Handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (98.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
80%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
80%
Best in category: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (92.8%)
Dry Performance
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Dry Braking
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Dry Handling
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
85%
Best: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
73%
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Kumho Ecsta PS71
48%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Noise Exterior
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
48%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Ride Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
61%
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Economy
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
75%
Kleber
Dynaxer UHP
Kumho Ecsta PS71
53%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Rolling Resistance
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
54%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
52%
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 6 (91.5%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison