Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127

The following comparison between the Kleber Dynaxer UHP summer tyre made by Kleber and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 also summer tyre but made by Hankook will lay focus on the strengths and weaknesses of these two tyres, along with summarizing their test results.

The Kleber Dynaxer UHP is a summer tyre with a rating of 68% according to our tests. This tyre is praised for its low exterior noise and good performance regarding kilometres driven. It has been ranked in 15th place in the test by Autobild, out of 53 tyres. However, its weak points include mediocre grip and low lateral control when it’s wet, as well as limited aquaplaning reserves.

On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127, a summer tyre from South Korea, has received a higher rating of 81% from our tests. It is recognized as Original Equipment for various car models like Audi Q8 and BMW X3 and has proven excellent performance in dry and wet braking. Its agile handling led to securing the 3rd position in the Autobild test. However, one downside of this tyre is its below-average kilometre performance, leading to early tyre replacement.

Comparatively, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 provides a more balanced all-round performance with better braking capabilities both on wet and dry roads. The Kleber Dynaxer UHP, as a quieter and potentially more economical choice, nonetheless showing weaknesses in wet conditions.

Neither tyre has been replaced by a newer model as of yet, ensuring customers that these models remain current.

In conclusion, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 outperforms the Kleber Dynaxer UHP according to all the reviewed tests, providing an optimal choice for drivers needing confidence in various weather conditions and performance reliability.