Segment
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Michelin Energy Saver +
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from France. Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kleber (58%). The first tyre test of Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Michelin Energy Saver + first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Dynaxer HP4 and the Energy Saver + were tested.
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Michelin Energy Saver +
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
