Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Cooper CS7 Upper-middle3. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Cooper CS7 vs. Maxxis Mecotra 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Cooper CS7 15.
Worst position in test
2. Cooper CS7 15.
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory3. Cooper CS7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory2. Cooper CS7 Satisfactory3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Cooper CS7 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
3. Cooper CS7 58%
Wet handling
3. Cooper CS7 36%
Wet circle cornering
1. Cooper CS7 78%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Cooper CS7 80%
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
3. Cooper CS7 48%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Cooper CS7 78%
Interior noise
1. Cooper CS7 72%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper CS7 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
