Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM

The following text will provide a comparison of two popular summer tyres, namely the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Barum Bravuris 5 HM. Both models have been lunged head-to-head in various tests, providing detailed insights into their strengths and weaknesses.

When considering our own ratings, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 clearly showcases superior performance, boasting a rating of 76% compared to the Barum Bravuris 5 HM's lower score of 39%.

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 holds a proud track record across several tests. In the ADAC test, it occupied 11th place out of 17, impressing with its low exterior noise. On top of that, Autobild 2018 praised the tyre for its positive environmental impact, good tread wear, and efficiency, though they also noted it falls short on wet roads. Additionally, in the GTÜ test, it landed the impressive 1st place, demonstrating its undeniable quality, whereas Autobild recognized it as the 14th best tyre amongst a vast pool of 53 considered models.

On the other hand, the Barum Bravuris 5 HM, manufactured by Barum, achieved the 15th position in the ADAC's mutual test, while Autobild placed it as the 29th best model out of 53. Furthermore, it ended up in the 8th position in the GTÜ test yet, unfortunately, no specific strengths or weaknesses were highlighted in these tests.

In the adac 2021 test, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was praised for its performance on dry roads and its fuel efficiency. However, the testers found it to display a slightly higher wear and weakness on wet roads. No data from the same test were found for the Barum Bravuris 5 HM.

In conclusion, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 shows generally better results in multiple tests, mostly scoring higher than the Barum Bravuris 5 HM and often being praised for its low exterior noise and efficiency. However, it does exhibit some weaknesses, most notably its performance on wet roads. The Barum Bravuris 5 HM, on the other hand, generally ranks lower in testing but is still a valid option to consider. Ultimately, the choice between these two models should be determined by the specific driving conditions and personal preferences of each driver.