Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Imperial (0%). The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Imperial SnowDragon UHP
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Imperial Snowdragon UHP Rating: Poor | 2.4 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 1 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||