Segment
2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial SnowDragon UHP vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Imperial (0%). The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Imperial SnowDragon UHP
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 35,5 | 25,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 1 | ||||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
