Segment
2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Imperial (0%). The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2023 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the UltraGrip Performance 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Imperial SnowDragon UHP
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Imperial Snowdragon UHP Rating: Poor | 2.4 | ||||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good | 1.7 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 40.4 | ||||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 | 32.6 | 28.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||