Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Imperial (0%). The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Imperial SnowDragon UHP
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 40.4 | ||||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP Rating: Poor | 5,3 | 2,1 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 1,5 |
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||