Segment
2. Imperial Snowdragon 3 Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost4. Viking WinTech Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial Snowdragon 3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Viking WinTech
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Viking WinTech Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 3 | 42,3 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 35,2 | 30,3 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 3 | 41,4 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 32,3 | 25 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 3 | 33,9 | 31,7 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 35,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
