Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea and WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
