Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Firestone (56%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 and Firestone Winterhawk 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS W442 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (92%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||