Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.63. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 41,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | 2- | 3+ | 1- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
