• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 and BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2, the rating is the same - 81%. The first tyre test of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
81%
Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Wet Braking
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
62%
Wet Handling
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Wet Circle Cornering
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
61%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Aquaplaning Cross
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Best in category: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (88.6%)
Dry Performance
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
80%
Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dry Braking
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Dry Handling
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Best in category: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (90.0%)
Snow Performance
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
81%
Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Snow Braking
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow Traction
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
Snow Handling
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Best: Giti Gitiwinter W2 (96.0%)
Snow Circle Cornering
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Best: Giti Gitiwinter W2 (91.0%)
Best in category: Kleber KRISALP HP3 (90.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
70%
Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Noise Exterior
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Best: Giti Gitiwinter W2 (95.0%)
Ride Comfort
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Best in category: Giti Gitiwinter W2 (95.0%)
Economy
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
78%
Hankook
W462 Winter i*cept RS3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rolling Resistance
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Best: Barum Polaris 5 (96.0%)
Mileage
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
Best: Michelin Alpin 6 (98.0%)
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 870 (90.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison