• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Table of contents:
# Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
/0%
Bridgestone Turanza T001
/0%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
/74%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
/0%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
/72%

Add to comparison

New comparison
Hankook
Bridgestone
Dunlop
Goodyear
Hankook
DimensionsR15 - R20 R15 - R19 R17 - R21 R17 - R22 R13 - R23
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Summer touring tyre comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs Bridgestone Turanza T001. Both target everyday drivers who value comfort and safety, backed by major European tyre tests. Manufacturers: Hankook and Bridgestone.


Model background: The Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 is a HU-made summer tyre, known as original equipment on the Citroën C3 Aircross. Our overall rating stands at 52%. It has since been replaced by the newer Hankook Ventus Prime 4. The Bridgestone Turanza T001 is an earlier-generation touring tyre from Bridgestone; no aggregate site rating is assigned here, but it remains well-documented in independent tests.


How they ranked in independent tests



  • AutoBild (50 tyres): Hankook K125 finished 2nd/50, Bridgestone T001 8th/50 — advantage Hankook on this very large field.

  • AutoZeitung (10 tyres): Hankook K125 6th/10, Bridgestone T001 7th/10 — narrow edge to Hankook.

  • ADAC (16 tyres): Bridgestone T001 surged to 2nd/16 and was singled out for excellent wet braking, while Hankook K125 placed 14th/16 — clear advantage Bridgestone in this safety-weighted test.


Overall test picture: The head-to-head is tight. Hankook wins two of the three mutual comparisons (AutoBild and AutoZeitung), often scoring strongly across broad performance criteria. However, Bridgestone’s standout ADAC result — particularly its class-leading wet braking callout — tilts the safety narrative in its favor. If you prioritize big-sample rankings and value, the K125 impresses; if you prioritize wet-safety excellence and balanced touring manners, the T001’s ADAC podium is compelling.


Strengths and weaknesses


Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

  • Strengths: Consistently competitive in large comparison groups (2/50 in AutoBild). Balanced performance suitable for everyday touring, with proven OE fitment credibility. Offers strong value for money in its class.

  • Weaknesses: Underwhelming in the ADAC evaluation (14/16), suggesting room for improvement in wet-biased safety disciplines. As an outgoing model, it’s now superseded by the Ventus Prime 4, which is the better pick if widely available.


Bridgestone Turanza T001


  • Strengths: Outstanding wet braking noted by ADAC and a 2nd/16 overall finish there point to strong safety and control in the rain. Solid mid-top pack placements in other magazines (8/50 in AutoBild) reinforce its well-rounded touring character.

  • Weaknesses: Marginally trails the Hankook in two of the three direct comparisons (AutoBild, AutoZeitung). As an older pattern, efficiency, comfort, and dry precision may be eclipsed by newer-generation designs.


Verdict: which tyre is better overall?


On pure test placements across all shared tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 holds a slim lead thanks to its excellent AutoBild 2/50 result and a small edge in AutoZeitung. However, if your priority is wet safety — stopping distance and confidence in the rain — the Bridgestone Turanza T001 is the safer bet, as underlined by its ADAC 2/16 finish and highlighted wet braking performance.


Buying tip: If you like the K125’s profile, consider its successor, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, for updated technology. For Bridgestone fans seeking a proven rain performer, the T001 remains a solid touring option.

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

6

Mutual tests

Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2017 225/50 R17
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-1-1
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Rating: Exemplary		2+2+2
Bridgestone Turanza T001
Rating: Good		1- 22-
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
Rating: Exemplary		2+2+1-
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Rating: Good		2+22-
Show test details
Autozeitung
Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2017 215/55 R17
Name Points totalWetDry
Best values in test256131133
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125225104121
Bridgestone Turanza T00122497127
Show test details
ADAC
ADAC Summer tyre test 2017 195/65 R15
Name WetDryWearComfortFuel consumption
Best values in test1,91,50,51,51,6
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Rating: Good		3,31,82,53,02,2
Bridgestone Turanza T001
Rating: Good		2,11,71,92,51,9
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2017 225/50 R17
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,134,6
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K12534,335,7
Bridgestone Turanza T00136,234,6
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT234,438,3
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 335,237,5
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2016 205/55 R16
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-1
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Rating: Exemplary		2+ 1- 1-
Bridgestone Turanza T001
Rating: -		2+ 2-3+
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Summer tyre test 2016 205/55 R16
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,627
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K12534,6 27,9
Bridgestone Turanza T00136,628,7
Show test details