18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Sava Intensa HP vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 /0%	Nexen N blue HD Plus /0%	Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 /0%	Sava Intensa HP /0%	Maxxis Premitra HP5 /42%	Nokian Line SUV /0%	Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R16	R13 - R22	R14 - R17	R14 - R16	R15 - R18	R15 - R19	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Premium

3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle

4. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle

5. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost

6. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost

7. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Nexen N blue HD Plus 430

2. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 84

3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 64

4. Sava Intensa HP 59

5. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 35

6. Nokian Line SUV 33

7. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 12

Number of tests

1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 31x

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 14x

3. Nexen N blue HD Plus 10x

4. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6x

5. Nokian Line SUV 5x

6. Sava Intensa HP 4x

7. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 3x

Best position in test

1. Nexen N blue HD Plus 1.

2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 1.

3. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 1.

4. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 2.

5. Nokian Line SUV 2.

6. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6.

7. Sava Intensa HP 8.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 5.

2. Nokian Line SUV 5.

3. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 9.

4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 20.

5. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 22.

6. Sava Intensa HP 26.

7. Nexen N blue HD Plus 31.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 3.67

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 3.79

3. Nokian Line SUV 4.2

4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 9.55

5. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 11.83

6. Sava Intensa HP 13.5

7. Nexen N blue HD Plus 13.6

Year of the last test

1. Maxxis Premitra HP5 2024

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 2020

3. Nexen N blue HD Plus 2019

4. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 2018

5. Sava Intensa HP 2018

6. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 2017

7. Nokian Line SUV 2017

Best rating in test

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary

2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good

3. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Good

4. Nokian Line SUV Good

5. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory

6. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory

7. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Worst rating in test

1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Good

2. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Good

3. Nokian Line SUV Good

4. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory

5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended

6. Nexen N blue HD Plus Weak

7. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autoklub ČR Summer tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance
Best values in test	100	100	100	109
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good	97,7	97,5	97,9	95,5
Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Weak	95,4	93,7	97	92,1
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Very good	100	100	100	100
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Very good	99,2	98,9	99,5	92,7
Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good	96,8	97,2	96,4	86,5
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak	95,6	93,6	97,5	97,2
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Wear	Comfort	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,0	1,6	1,0	1,7	1,6
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good	2,2	1,7	2,5	3,1	2,0
Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	1,6	2,0	3,8	1,9
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good	2,3	1,6	2,0	3,4	2,0
Sava Intensa HP Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	2,7	2,0	3,9	2,2
Show test details