Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium3. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 97,7 | 97,5 | 97,9 | 95,5 | |||
| Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Weak | 95,4 | 93,7 | 97 | 92,1 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Very good | 99,2 | 98,9 | 99,5 | 92,7 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | ||
| Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,8 | 1,9 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 152 | 18 | 38 | 39 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 | 146 | 60 | 47 | 39 | |||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 152 | 63 | 49 | 40 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
