18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Sava Intensa HP vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 /0%	Nexen N blue HD Plus /0%	Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 /0%	Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance /38%	Sava Intensa HP /0%	Nokian Line SUV /0%	Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 /0%	Vredestein Sportrac 5 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R16	R13 - R22	R14 - R17	R14 - R20	R14 - R16	R15 - R19	R14 - R19	R14 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Premium

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

4. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium

5. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle

6. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle

7. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost

8. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Nexen N blue HD Plus 430

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

3. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 84

4. Sava Intensa HP 59

5. Vredestein Sportrac 5 55

6. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 35

7. Nokian Line SUV 33

8. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 12

Number of tests

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 14x

3. Nexen N blue HD Plus 10x

4. Vredestein Sportrac 5 9x

5. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6x

6. Nokian Line SUV 5x

7. Sava Intensa HP 4x

8. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 3x

Best position in test

1. Nexen N blue HD Plus 1.

2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 1.

3. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 1.

4. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 2.

5. Nokian Line SUV 2.

6. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

7. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6.

8. Sava Intensa HP 8.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 5.

2. Nokian Line SUV 5.

3. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 9.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

5. Vredestein Sportrac 5 16.

6. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 22.

7. Sava Intensa HP 26.

8. Nexen N blue HD Plus 31.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 3.67

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 3.79

3. Nokian Line SUV 4.2

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

5. Vredestein Sportrac 5 7.78

6. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 11.83

7. Sava Intensa HP 13.5

8. Nexen N blue HD Plus 13.6

Year of the last test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 2020

3. Nexen N blue HD Plus 2019

4. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 2018

5. Sava Intensa HP 2018

6. Vredestein Sportrac 5 2018

7. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 2017

8. Nokian Line SUV 2017

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplary

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary

3. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Good

4. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Good

5. Nokian Line SUV Good

6. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory

7. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory

8. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Good

2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Good

3. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Good

4. Nokian Line SUV Good

5. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory

6. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient

7. Nexen N blue HD Plus Weak

8. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autoklub ČR Summer tyre test 2017 215/65 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance
Best values in test	100	100	100	109
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good	97,7	97,5	97,9	95,5
Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Weak	95,4	93,7	97	92,1
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Very good	100	100	100	100
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Very good	98,7	98,7	98,7	109
Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good	96,8	97,2	96,4	86,5
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak	95,6	93,6	97,5	97,2
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Wear	Comfort	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,0	1,6	1,0	1,7	1,6
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good	2,2	1,7	2,5	3,1	2,0
Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	1,6	2,0	3,8	1,9
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good	2,3	1,6	2,0	3,4	2,0
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Good	2,1	2,0	2,0	3,9	2,1
Sava Intensa HP Rating: Satisfactory	2,2	2,7	2,0	3,9	2,2
Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good	2,0	1,8	2,0	3,3	2,1
Show test details