• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5

# Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
/0%
Nexen N blue HD Plus
/0%
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
/0%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
/38%
Nokian Line SUV
/0%
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
/0%
Vredestein Sportrac 5
/0%

Add to comparison

Hankook
Nexen
Continental
Goodyear
Nokian
Yokohama
Vredestein
DimensionsR13 - R16 R13 - R22 R14 - R17 R14 - R20 R15 - R19 R14 - R19 R14 - R18
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

3

Mutual tests

Autoklub ČR
Name Points totalWetDryRolling resistance
Best values in test100100100109
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
Rating: Good
97,797,597,995,5
Nexen N blue HD plus
Rating: Weak
95,493,79792,1
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Rating: Very good
100 100 100 100
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Rating: Very good
98,798,798,7109
Nokian Line SUV
Rating: Good
96,897,296,486,5
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Rating: Weak
95,693,697,597,2
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDryWearComfortFuel consumption
Best values in test2,01,61,01,71,6
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
Rating: Good
2,21,72,53,12,0
Nexen N blue HD plus
Rating: Satisfactory
3,11,6 2,03,81,9
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Rating: Good
2,31,6 2,03,42,0
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Rating: Good
2,12,02,03,92,1
Vredestein Sportrac 5
Rating: Good
2,0 1,82,03,32,1
Show test details
ACE
Name Points totalWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test152183839
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425146604739
Nexen N blue HD plus152 634940
Show test details