Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium3. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Nexen N blue HD Plus
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary3. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 97,7 | 97,5 | 97,9 | 95,5 | |||
| Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Weak | 95,4 | 93,7 | 97 | 92,1 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | ||
| Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,8 | 1,9 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 152 | 18 | 38 | 39 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 | 146 | 60 | 47 | 39 | |||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 152 | 63 | 49 | 40 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
