Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle4. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle5. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Sava Intensa HP vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
6. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good4. Nokian Line SUV Good5. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Nokian Line SUV Good4. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory5. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 97,7 | 97,5 | 97,9 | 95,5 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Very good | 99,2 | 98,9 | 99,5 | 92,7 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 96,8 | 97,2 | 96,4 | 86,5 | |||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak | 95,6 | 93,6 | 97,5 | 97,2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,0 | ||
| Sava Intensa HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 3,9 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
