Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Hankook (81%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 has C wet grip rating, whereas 54% of Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has A rating.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 97,7 | 97,5 | 97,9 | 95,5 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||