12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 /87%	Vredestein Quatrac /92%	Firestone Multiseason 2 /55%	Toyo Celsius AS2 /52%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R15 - R20	R13 - R19	R15 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

The comparison of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Vredestein Quatrac shows two well-rounded all-season tyres that target different priorities. Neither model has been officially replaced on our pages, so there is no direct successor link to include. For manufacturer information visit Hankook and Vredestein.

Summary of test outcomes: across major test houses the tyres swap places depending on the focus of the evaluation. In AUTOBILD comparatives Vredestein often finished marginally ahead (position 2 vs Hankook position 3 in a 32-tyre test), praised repeatedly for wet circle cornering, wet handling and aquaplaning reserves. ADAC shows a different picture: Hankook placed higher (3 vs Vredestein 6 in a 16-tyre ADAC test), reflecting Hankook’s consistent, balanced performance. Our internal scoring also ranks the Vredestein slightly higher (Vredestein 93% vs Hankook 88%), reflecting stronger results in wet tests and perceived overall balance.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 — strengths & weaknesses

Strengths: Outstanding dry handling and short dry braking distances, very good snow performance in many tests, low rolling resistance and strong predicted mileage. Reviewers repeatedly praise its comfort and stable handling in mixed conditions.

Weaknesses: Aquaplaning resistance is a recurring shortfall in some independent tests, and wet braking/handling can be slightly weaker than the Vredestein. A few reports note a slightly higher exterior noise relative to the quietest all-season tyres.

Overall: A great choice for drivers who want strong dry and winter grip plus low rolling resistance and long mileage, but who can accept slightly reduced aquaplaning reserves.

Vredestein Quatrac — strengths & weaknesses

Strengths: A wet-weather specialist — excellent wet handling, short wet circle lap times and top aquaplaning resistance. Tests also highlight a quiet, comfortable ride and precise, dynamic behaviour in wet conditions. It scores very well across mixed-weather laps.

Weaknesses: Several test reports point to only average mileage and somewhat higher rolling resistance. Dry performance is good but not always class-leading compared with the Hankook’s best-in-class dry results.

Overall: The Quatrac is preferable if you prioritise safety and control in wet conditions and a refined ride, and are willing to sacrifice a little in longevity and fuel economy.

Head-to-head verdict
Both tyres perform well in all-season roles, but they have different emphases. The Vredestein generally scores higher in wet-focused evaluations and is our higher-rated tyre overall (93% vs 88%), giving it the edge for drivers who face frequent heavy rain or places where aquaplaning risk is a concern. The Hankook is the better all-round performer for drivers who value dry handling, winter traction and lower rolling resistance combined with strong predicted mileage — factors that earned it higher places in some institutional tests like ADAC and multiple AUTOBILD editions.

Recommendation: choose the Vredestein Quatrac if wet performance, aquaplaning resistance and ride comfort are your top priorities; choose the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 if you want superior dry handling, strong snow performance and lower rolling resistance with better long-term mileage.

Segment

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium

2. Vredestein Quatrac Premium

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 135

2. Vredestein Quatrac 85

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 81

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 61

Number of tests

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 20x

2. Vredestein Quatrac 16x

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 14x

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 13x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 1.

2. Vredestein Quatrac 1.

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 6.

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 7.

Worst position in test

1. Vredestein Quatrac 6.

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 13.

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 16.

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 22.

Average position in tests

1. Vredestein Quatrac 3.13

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 4.65

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 10.92

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 2025

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 2025

3. Vredestein Quatrac 2025

4. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 2024

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary

2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Good

3. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

80%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

79%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

73%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Snow traction

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 83%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 78%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 78%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 60%

Snow braking

1. Vredestein Quatrac 85%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 85%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 83%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 77%

Snow handling

1. Vredestein Quatrac 81%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 79%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 64%

Snow cornering

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 74%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 75%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 66%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 57%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

87%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

80%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

66%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

65%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Vredestein Quatrac 83%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 78%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 76%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 55%

Wet braking

1. Vredestein Quatrac 91%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 79%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 74%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 51%

Wet handling

1. Vredestein Quatrac 90%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 75%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 74%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 52%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 90%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 84%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 79%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 54%

Wet circle cornering

1. Vredestein Quatrac 92%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 84%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 74%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 56%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 B

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 B

3. Vredestein Quatrac ?

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

84%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

78%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

66%

Dry braking

1. Vredestein Quatrac 79%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 79%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 67%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 65%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 81%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 82%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 68%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 66%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

81%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

71%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

67%

Exterior noise

1. Vredestein Quatrac 82%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 79%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 73%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 68%

Comfort

1. Vredestein Quatrac 79%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 73%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 72%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 71 dB

2. Vredestein Quatrac ?

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

4. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Toyo
Celsius AS2

81%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

75%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750

67%

Vredestein
Quatrac

59%

Rolling resistance

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 86%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 75%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 73%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 67%

Price/value

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 88%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 69%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 66%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 57%

Mileage

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 88%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 70%

3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 59%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 48%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 C

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 C

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

4. Vredestein Quatrac ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2025 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	1	1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary	2	1-	2
VREDESTEIN Quatrac Rating: Exemplary	1-	1-	1-
Show test details

ADAC Allyear tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	5.4	1.8	2.3
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good	2.7	2.2	2.9
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good	2.8	2.2	3.1
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	3.6	3.1	3.6
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3.8	2.3	3.8
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Allyear tyre test 2023 195/65 R15

Name
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Highly recommended
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended
Firestone Multiseason 2
Toyo Celsius AS2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	37.7	45
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750	41.3	49.5
Vredestein Quatrac	40.3	45.4
Firestone Multiseason 2	41.8	47.9
Toyo Celsius AS2	40.9	50.6
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,9	44,4
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750	42,1	48
Vredestein Quatrac	41,7	47,1
Firestone Multiseason 2	45,9	48,9
Toyo Celsius AS2	43,5	53,2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-	1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good	2	2+	1-	3+
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory	2+	2	2+	2-
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	2	2+
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2021 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1	2+	1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary	1	2	2+
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good	1	2+	2+	3+
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary	1	1-	2	1
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Good	2	2+	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,7	45
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750	41,1	47,2
Vredestein Quatrac	40,6	46,3
Firestone Multiseason 2	41,2	49,3
Show test details

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands