Segment
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than GT (55%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo has a better rating of 66% compared to 65% of the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and the Alnac 4G Winter were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
