Segment
3. Pirelli SCORPION Premium4. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium6. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle7. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: GoodYear Wrangler AT Adventure vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs. Falken Azenis FK520 vs. Pirelli SCORPION vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Pirelli SCORPION 3.337. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary2. Pirelli SCORPION Exemplary3. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended4. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Test winner7. GoodYear Wrangler AT Adventure Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
4. Pirelli SCORPION Good5. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -6. GoodYear Wrangler AT Adventure Conditionally recommended7. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Goodyear Wrangler AT Adventure Rating: Conditionally recommended | 5+ | 4 | 2 | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Pirelli Scorpion Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
