14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 85% compared to 84% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance+ and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

#	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /85%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 177

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 22x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.32

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Rolling resistance

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Price/value

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 69%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84.3%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2.4	2.3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	35,5	25,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2	2-	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Recommended	193	66	44	53	18	7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	63	42	60	14	9
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	7,6	7,8	8,4	8	8
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands