18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /93%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R14 - R20	R14 - R19	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

71%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

59%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

58%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 62%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 61%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 47%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 42%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 53%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 47%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 33%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 55%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 51%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 44%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 63%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 64%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 62%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

78%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

69%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

69%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 59%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 52%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 59%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 51%

Snow handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 79%

Snow cornering

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

Dry

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

63%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

46%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 27%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 17%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 15%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 62%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

72%

Exterior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 72%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 83%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 69%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

61%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

53%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

48%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 73%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 41%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 13%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 4%

Price/value

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 51%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.7%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

0%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

0%

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

77.7%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1–	1
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good	2	2	2	1
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 Rating: Good	3	2–	1	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2+	2	2+	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	1.7
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good	1.7
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2.5
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good	2.2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	32.6	28.5
Kleber Krisalp HP3	36.2	27.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	36.0	27.3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	35.6	28.0
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1	2+
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	36.9	29.4
Kleber Krisalp HP3	37.8	29.3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+	1-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	33,9	30,1
Kleber Krisalp HP3	35,1	29,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	34,9	30,5
Show test details

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands