In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the UltraGrip 9+ and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 3 tests
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Nokian WR Snowproof
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.