Segment
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Premium2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Matador (40%). The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C rating.
| # | GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%
