18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ /0%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /95%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /99%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R14 - R16	R14 - R22	R14 - R18	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Premium

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 36

Number of tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 17x

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 7x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 2.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 8.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.71

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 4.71

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 2022

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

93%

GoodYear
UltraGrip 9+

84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 88%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 87%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 62%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 87%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

Snow performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 91%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 100%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 80%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

GoodYear
UltraGrip 9+

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 70%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 79%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry driving behavior

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 100%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 78%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Dry lane changing

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Dry performance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 67%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 70%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear
UltraGrip 9+

88%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 76%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 87%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 92%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 88%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 90%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ B

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip 9+

79%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 74%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 98%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 77%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip 9+

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 75%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

Price/value

1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 75%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 68%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

3. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ E

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

GoodYear
UltraGrip 9+

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ 85%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 -27%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands