Segment
2. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium4. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium5. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Michelin Primacy 3 vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good5. Nokian Line SUV Good
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended4. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended5. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Rating: Very good | 9,0 | 9,7 | 8 | 8 | |||
| Michelin Primacy 3 Rating: Good | 8,4 | 9,6 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 9,6 | 9,2 | 7 | 6 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,1 | 7,8 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
