18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 /0%	Pirelli P ZERO /0%	Nokian WetProof /59%	Falken Azenis FK510 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%

Dimensions	R17 - R22	R17 - R22	R14 - R20	R17 - R22	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

In this article, we will compare two popular summer tyres – the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Pirelli P ZERO. Both of these tyres have been tested and reviewed by various organizations such as AutoMotorSport, Autobild, ADAC, and Gute-Fahrt. We will discuss their strengths, weaknesses, and overall performance in these tests to help you make an informed decision about which tyre to choose.

The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a summer tyre with a focus on performance and handling. Made in Slovenia and Germany, it has a 94% rating on our site. It replaced the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and has since been replaced by the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The Asymmetric 5 has performed well in various tests, often securing top positions. Notable strengths include aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, comfort, wet braking, and mileage.

On the other hand, the Pirelli P ZERO is an Italian-made summer tyre, boasting an 88% rating. It excels in various features such as dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. Unlike the Asymmetric 5, the P ZERO has not been replaced by a newer model.

In the AutoMotorSport test featuring 11 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 secured the top position, while the P ZERO came in fourth. The Asymmetric 5 outperformed the P ZERO in almost all categories, including aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, and comfort. The P ZERO's only win was in the wet side guide category.

Similarly, in the Autobild test with 53 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 once again ranked first, while the P ZERO came in fourth. The Asymmetric 5 dominated in terms of price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. The P ZERO performed well in dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling.

In the ADAC test, the Asymmetric 5 ranked third out of 16 tyres, while the P ZERO came in at twelfth. The Asymmetric 5 performed well in terms of mileage, while the P ZERO excelled in dry braking, dry driving behavior, safety, exterior noise, wet circle cornering, and wet handling.

Last but not least, in the Gute-Fahrt test of 10 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 secured the second position, while the P ZERO came in seventh. The P ZERO showed its strength in wet circle cornering.

In conclusion, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has an overall better performance in mutual tests, showcasing its excellent aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, comfort, wet braking, and mileage. Meanwhile, the Pirelli P ZERO performs well in dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. Ultimately, the choice between these two tyres will depend on your specific needs and preferences, but both options offer good performance in their respective strengths.

Segment

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Premium

2. Pirelli P ZERO Premium

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

4. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle

5. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Pirelli P ZERO 330

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 173

4. Falken Azenis FK510 125

5. Nokian WetProof 47

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Falken Azenis FK510 29x

3. Pirelli P ZERO 17x

4. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 15x

5. Nokian WetProof 14x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Falken Azenis FK510 1.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

4. Pirelli P ZERO 1.

5. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 1.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 6.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. Falken Azenis FK510 15.

4. Nokian WetProof 17.

5. Pirelli P ZERO 25.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2.33

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. Falken Azenis FK510 5.45

4. Nokian WetProof 5.64

5. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

2. Nokian WetProof 2023

3. Falken Azenis FK510 2022

4. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2022

5. Pirelli P ZERO 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary

3. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary

4. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended

5. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Pirelli P ZERO Good

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Good

3. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended

4. Nokian WetProof Recommended

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof

89%

Pirelli
P ZERO

88%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

87%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Falken
Azenis FK510

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 87%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 84%

3. Nokian WetProof 82%

4. Pirelli P ZERO 81%

5. Falken Azenis FK510 80%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 91%

2. Nokian WetProof 75%

3. Pirelli P ZERO 76%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 76%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 72%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 89%

2. Pirelli P ZERO 88%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 84%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

5. Nokian WetProof 0%

Wet handling

1. Nokian WetProof 98%

2. Pirelli P ZERO 95%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 94%

4. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 91%

5. Falken Azenis FK510 77%

Wet circle cornering

1. Nokian WetProof 100%

2. Pirelli P ZERO 95%

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 85%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 82%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WetProof A

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 A

3. Falken Azenis FK510 A

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

5. Pirelli P ZERO B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof

97%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

90%

Pirelli
P ZERO

90%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

85%

Falken
Azenis FK510

70%

Dry braking

1. Pirelli P ZERO 96%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 92%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 89%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 81%

5. Nokian WetProof 0%

Dry handling

1. Nokian WetProof 97%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 97%

3. Pirelli P ZERO 95%

4. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 94%

5. Falken Azenis FK510 87%

Offroad

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

92%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

75.9%

Nokian
WetProof

0%

Pirelli
P ZERO

0%

Falken
Azenis FK510

0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof

97%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

79%

Pirelli
P ZERO

77%

Falken
Azenis FK510

74%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

64%

Exterior noise

1. Nokian WetProof 97%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 80%

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 75%

4. Pirelli P ZERO 70%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 55%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 70 dB

3. Nokian WetProof ?

4. Pirelli P ZERO ?

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

75%

Falken
Azenis FK510

74%

Nokian
WetProof

58%

Pirelli
P ZERO

53%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 66%

3. Nokian WetProof 62%

4. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 61%

5. Pirelli P ZERO 58%

Mileage

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 95%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 91%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 79%

4. Nokian WetProof 63%

5. Pirelli P ZERO 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 C

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Nokian WetProof C

4. Falken Azenis FK510 E

5. Pirelli P ZERO E

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AutoMotorSport Summer tyre test 2020 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Comfort
Best values in test	9,4	9,3	10	10	10
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good	9,4	9,2	6	10	10
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Very good	8,2	8,5	6	8	9
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good	6,7	7,6	7	7	7
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Very good	8,1	9,1	7	6	7
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1	28,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5	33,2	30,8
Pirelli P ZERO	34,8	34,6
Falken Azenis FK510	36	30,7
Continental PremiumContact 6	33,2	30,2
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	1,3	2,8	2,0	1,6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good	2,3	1,7	3,1	2,0	1,9
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Satisfactory	1,8	1,3	2,9	3,0	2,7
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,9	3,0	2,0	2,0
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	1,7	2,4	3,6	2,0	2,1
Show test details

Gute-Fahrt Summer tyre test 2019 225/40 R18

Name
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good -
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good +
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Very good
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	1	1
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	1
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good	1-	2+	3+
Nokian WetProof Rating: Good	2+	2+	2
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	2
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	1-	1-
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Exemplary	1-	1-
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,2	28,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5	34,7	28,8
Pirelli P ZERO	35,1	28,9
Nokian WetProof	35,2	29,7
Falken Azenis FK510	36	29
Continental PremiumContact 6	35,8	29,9
Show test details

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands