18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 /0%	Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 /75%	Pirelli P ZERO /0%	Nokian WetProof /59%	Falken Azenis FK510 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%

Dimensions	R17 - R22	R17 - R22	R17 - R22	R14 - R20	R17 - R22	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

In this tyre comparison, we will be reviewing the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 summer tyres, discussing their strengths and weaknesses based on various test results. Our aim is to help you make a well-informed decision when choosing the right tyre for your vehicle.

The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a successor of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, scoring a 94% rating in general. This tyre is made in Slovenia and Germany and serves as a replacement for the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. It performed exceptionally well when tested by Autozeitung, Autobild, and ADAC with a first, first, and third position respectively. The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is highly rated for its aquaplaning - cross, wet braking, wet handling, price/value, and mileage.

On the other hand, Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is a Ultra High-Performance tyre made in Korea, with an 87% rating overall. This tyre is often used as original equipment for Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3. In the same tests by Autozeitung, Autobild, and ADAC, it scored the 9th, 3rd, and 14th position respectively. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is noted for its wet braking performance.

When comparing these two tyres based on the test results, it is clear that the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 outperforms the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 in most categories, especially in wet conditions. With its exceptional aquaplaning resistance, wet braking, and wet handling capabilities, the GoodYear tyre proves to be a safer and more reliable choice. Additionally, the GoodYear tyre shows better mileage and price/value balance, making it a more cost-effective option overall.

In conclusion, while both GoodYear and Hankook are reputable tyre manufacturers, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 stands out as a better option when considering all aspects. It provides better performance, safety features, and overall value for your money. However, if wet braking is your top priority, then the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 might be more suitable for you.

Segment

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium

3. Pirelli P ZERO Premium

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

5. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle

6. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Pirelli P ZERO 330

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 173

4. Falken Azenis FK510 125

5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 109

6. Nokian WetProof 47

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Falken Azenis FK510 29x

3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 19x

4. Pirelli P ZERO 17x

5. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 15x

6. Nokian WetProof 14x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Falken Azenis FK510 1.

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

4. Pirelli P ZERO 1.

5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 1.

6. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 1.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 6.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 14.

4. Falken Azenis FK510 15.

5. Nokian WetProof 17.

6. Pirelli P ZERO 25.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2.33

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

3. Falken Azenis FK510 5.45

4. Nokian WetProof 5.64

5. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06

6. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 6.11

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 2025

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

3. Nokian WetProof 2023

4. Falken Azenis FK510 2022

5. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2022

6. Pirelli P ZERO 2020

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary

3. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary

4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary

5. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended

6. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Pirelli P ZERO Good

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Good

3. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended

4. Nokian WetProof Recommended

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

6. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof

89%

Pirelli
P ZERO

88%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

84%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

83%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

75%

Falken
Azenis FK510

72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 84%

2. Nokian WetProof 82%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 81%

4. Pirelli P ZERO 82%

5. Falken Azenis FK510 81%

6. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 80%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 93%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 86%

3. Pirelli P ZERO 84%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 81%

5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 77%

6. Nokian WetProof 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 80%

3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 80%

4. Pirelli P ZERO 79%

5. Nokian WetProof 75%

6. Falken Azenis FK510 75%

Wet handling

1. Pirelli P ZERO 99%

2. Nokian WetProof 98%

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 85%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 83%

5. Falken Azenis FK510 72%

6. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 70%

Wet circle cornering

1. Nokian WetProof 100%

2. Pirelli P ZERO 93%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 77%

4. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 75%

5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 71%

6. Falken Azenis FK510 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Nokian WetProof A

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 A

4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 A

5. Falken Azenis FK510 A

6. Pirelli P ZERO B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
P ZERO

98%

Nokian
WetProof

97%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

90%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

85%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

82%

Falken
Azenis FK510

68%

Dry braking

1. Pirelli P ZERO 97%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 94%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 94%

4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 83%

5. Falken Azenis FK510 79%

6. Nokian WetProof 0%

Dry handling

1. Pirelli P ZERO 100%

2. Nokian WetProof 97%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 98%

4. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 84%

5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 84%

6. Falken Azenis FK510 59%

Offroad

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

92%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

75.9%

Pirelli
P ZERO

0%

Nokian
WetProof

0%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

0%

Falken
Azenis FK510

0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WetProof

97%

Falken
Azenis FK510

73%

Pirelli
P ZERO

72%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

69%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

64%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

63%

Exterior noise

1. Nokian WetProof 97%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 78%

3. Pirelli P ZERO 70%

4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 67%

5. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 64%

6. Continental PremiumContact 6 54%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 70 dB

3. Nokian WetProof ?

4. Pirelli P ZERO ?

5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ?

6. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

85%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

81%

Falken
Azenis FK510

75%

Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127

71%

Nokian
WetProof

58%

Pirelli
P ZERO

51%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 77%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 71%

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 69%

4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 65%

5. Nokian WetProof 62%

6. Pirelli P ZERO 47%

Mileage

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 94%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 94%

3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 66%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 64%

5. Nokian WetProof 63%

6. Pirelli P ZERO 64%

Price/value

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 81%

3. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 76%

4. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 66%

5. Nokian WetProof 49%

6. Pirelli P ZERO 23%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 C

3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 C

4. Nokian WetProof C

5. Falken Azenis FK510 E

6. Pirelli P ZERO E

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2021 225/40 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	92	93	93
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Test winner	92	93	92
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127	78	69	87
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Highly recommended	86	89	83
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Highly recommended	89	85	93
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	1-	1
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	1
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	2+	3+
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1-
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	1
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1	28,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5	33,2	30,8
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127	34,7	30,3
Pirelli P ZERO	34,8	34,6
Falken Azenis FK510	36	30,7
Continental PremiumContact 6	33,2	30,2
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	1,3	2,8	2,0	1,6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good	2,3	1,7	3,1	2,0	1,9
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory	3,1	2,0	3,4	2,5	1,8
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Satisfactory	1,8	1,3	2,9	3,0	2,7
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,9	3,0	2,0	2,0
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good	1,7	2,4	3,6	2,0	2,1
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	1	1
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	1
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	2
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good	1-	2+	3+
Nokian WetProof Rating: Good	2+	2+	2
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	2
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,2	28,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5	34,7	28,8
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127	35,2	28,7
Pirelli P ZERO	35,1	28,9
Nokian WetProof	35,2	29,7
Falken Azenis FK510	36	29
Continental PremiumContact 6	35,8	29,9
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Summer tyre test 2021 225/40 R18

Name
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Test winner
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Recommended
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended
Show test details

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands