18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 /0%	Pirelli P ZERO /0%	Falken Azenis FK510 /0%	Vredestein Ultrac Satin /0%	Continental PremiumContact 6 /76%

Dimensions	R17 - R22	R17 - R22	R17 - R22	R16 - R20	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

The following comparison is between the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and the Pirelli P ZERO, which are popular models produced by Goodyear and Pirelli respectively, both high-profile manufacturers in the tyre industry. Both tyres are summer type, catering to optimal performance in dry and wet conditions characteristic of the season.

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, a model made in Germany, has made a name for its low rolling resistance as cited in the Automotorsport comparison. This feature particularly speaks of the tyre's fuel efficiency. The model also ranks first for its dry driving behaviour in ACE's testing, asserting its superior performance in dry conditions. Despite not having a previous version, the tyre has been replaced by a newer model, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5.

On the other hand, the Italian-made Pirelli P ZERO stands out for its brilliant handling capacities -- whether dry or wet. Automotorsport acknowledges this model for its dry handling, dry lane changing, dry steering response, wet handling, and wet safety functionalities. Dry braking and wet circle cornering capabilities are also features the tyre is lauded for in ACE's review. As of now, there's no newer model that has replaced the P ZERO.

When it comes to mutual tests positions, both tyres have had fair shares of top positions in various evaluations. In detail, the Goodyear model has secured the first position in Automotorsport, second in Sport Auto and GTU, and third in Sportscars. Unfortunately, this tyre didn't have good performance in the ACE test, where it ended up eighth. The Pirelli P ZERO, conversely, managed the fourth position in GTU, fifth in Automotorsport and Sport Auto, sixth in Sportscars, albeit settling for a seventh spot in ACE.

In conclusion, the decision between Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and Pirelli P ZERO is subjective and depends greatly on the driver's priorities. If fuel efficiency and dry driving behaviour are the top concern, the former may be the better choice. However, for those emphasising handling capabilities in dry and wet conditions, Pirelli P ZERO may prove themselves as a worthy candidate. Regardless of the choice, it's clear that both models deliver excellent performance as summer tyres, each with its own strengths.

Segment

1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Premium

2. Pirelli P ZERO Premium

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium

5. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Pirelli P ZERO 330

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 296

3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 184

4. Falken Azenis FK510 125

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 70

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 36x

2. Falken Azenis FK510 29x

3. Pirelli P ZERO 17x

4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 12x

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 12x

Best position in test

1. Falken Azenis FK510 1.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 1.

3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 1.

4. Pirelli P ZERO 1.

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 3.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 8.

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 8.

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 12.

4. Falken Azenis FK510 15.

5. Pirelli P ZERO 25.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 3.06

2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 4.5

3. Falken Azenis FK510 5.45

4. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 7.75

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 2023

2. Falken Azenis FK510 2022

3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 2021

4. Pirelli P ZERO 2020

5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary

2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary

3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended

4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended

5. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Pirelli P ZERO Good

2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended

4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
P ZERO

85%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

83%

Falken
Azenis FK510

82%

Goodyear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

76%

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

74%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken Azenis FK510 88%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 85%

3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 83%

4. Continental PremiumContact 6 73%

5. Pirelli P ZERO 58%

Wet braking

1. Falken Azenis FK510 99%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 75%

4. Pirelli P ZERO 75%

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken Azenis FK510 82%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 82%

3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 79%

4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 78%

5. Pirelli P ZERO 69%

Wet handling

1. Pirelli P ZERO 93%

2. Falken Azenis FK510 88%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 88%

4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 85%

5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 83%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Falken Azenis FK510 A

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 A

3. Pirelli P ZERO B

4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 B

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 6

91%

Pirelli
P ZERO

91%

Goodyear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

85%

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

83%

Falken
Azenis FK510

78%

Dry braking

1. Pirelli P ZERO 88%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 86%

3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 81%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 79%

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 68%

Dry handling

1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 93%

2. Pirelli P ZERO 94%

3. Continental PremiumContact 6 90%

4. Falken Azenis FK510 87%

5. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 85%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

85%

Pirelli
P ZERO

81%

Goodyear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

81%

Falken
Azenis FK510

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

74%

Exterior noise

1. Falken Azenis FK510 98%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 85%

3. Pirelli P ZERO 83%

4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 83%

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB

2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin ?

3. Pirelli P ZERO ?

4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 ?

5. Continental PremiumContact 6 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

93%

Continental
PremiumContact 6

85%

Falken
Azenis FK510

80%

Vredestein
Ultrac Satin

75%

Pirelli
P ZERO

65%

Rolling resistance

1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 85%

3. Falken Azenis FK510 80%

4. Vredestein Ultrac Satin 75%

5. Pirelli P ZERO 65%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 C

2. Continental PremiumContact 6 C

3. Falken Azenis FK510 E

4. Pirelli P ZERO E

5. Vredestein Ultrac Satin ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Automotorsport Summer tyre test 2018 225/45 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	9,4	9,8	9,3	10
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3	8,0	7,6	8,3	9,4
Pirelli P ZERO	8,3	8,5	8,6	5,9
Falken Azenis FK510	8,5	9,2	7,5	8,6
Continental PremiumContact 6	8,5	8,5	8,7	8,0
Show test details

ACE Summer tyre test 2018 235/45 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	150	55	39	14	7
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Recommended	139	59	45	17	8
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended	141	58	50	16	8
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended	150	66	46	16	9
Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Recommended	134	57	43	15	8
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended	145	63	48	18	7
Show test details

Automotorsport Summer tyre test 2017 245/45 R18

Name	Points total
Best values in test	9,4
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Still recommended	7,9
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended	8,8
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended	8,0
Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Still recommended	7,7
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended	8,4
Show test details

SportAuto Summer tyre test 2017 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact
Best values in test	9,5	9,5	9,4
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Recommended	8,6	9,1	9,4
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended	7,4	9,2	9,4
Show test details

Sportscars Summer tyre test 2017 235/35 R19

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	2+	1-
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Satisfactory	2	2+
Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Recommended	2+	2
Show test details

Automotorsport Summer tyre test 2016 235/40 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,4	9,6	9,5	10	10
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Highly recommended	9,4	9,6	9,3	10	8
Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Recommended	8,3	8,6	8,3	7	7
Show test details

GTÜ Summer tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	278	146	143	25	10
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3	267	134	133	19	10
Pirelli P ZERO	263	133	130	13	9
Falken Azenis FK510	244	114	130	16	10
Show test details

Comparison: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands