Segment
2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and Kumho Crugen HP91, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Kumho Crugen HP91 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and the Crugen HP91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 51% of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Kumho Crugen HP91 also have B wet ratings. We also know where Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is made - Germany.
| # | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
| Kumho Crugen HP91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||