Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle4. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle5. Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.673. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory4. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 | 37,6 | 30,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ | 36,3 | 27,7 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort | 36,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
