Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle5. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle6. Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.674. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended4. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 | 37,6 | 30,5 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort | 36,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
