Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodride Allseason Elite Z-401 vs. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary3. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended3. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Goodride AllSeason Elite Z-401 | 44.6 | 58.4 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 38.6 | 47.4 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.5 | 50.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Goodride Allseason Elite Z-401 | 48,7 | 58,5 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 44,9 | 63,7 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 45,9 | 48,9 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
