Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost5. Viking WinTech Lowcost6. Avon ZV7 Lowcost7. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost5. Viking WinTech Lowcost6. Avon ZV7 Lowcost7. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
2. Avon ZV7 278
6. Avon ZV7 8.
7. Avon ZV7 42.
5. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.776. Avon ZV7 18.557. Viking WinTech 20.83
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended4. Viking WinTech Recommended5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory6. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory7. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended3. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient6. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,4 | 30,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||