Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost3. Viking WinTech Lowcost4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost5. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Viking WinTech vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.774. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Viking WinTech Recommended4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
