Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.77
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
7
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.4 | 29.2 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | |||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | |||||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,4 | 30,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
