Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost4. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
| # | Giti Gitiwinter W2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Avon ZV7
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R0 - R21 | R13 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost4. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
1. Avon ZV7 278
4. Avon ZV7 8.
4. Avon ZV7 42.
3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.774. Avon ZV7 18.55
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
2. Avon ZV7 Sufficient3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
4. Avon ZV7 0%
4. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 0%
4. Avon ZV7 0%
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.4 | 29.2 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | |||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||