Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.77
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.4 | 29.2 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
