Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost5. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost5. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.565. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory5. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended4. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 35,2 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||